How to choose a Next.js boilerplate: decision framework for 2026

Choosing the right Next.js boilerplate depends on four factors. Here's how to evaluate each one.

1. Payment processor requirements

This is the most restrictive factor. Stripe operates in 46 countries. Polar.sh operates in 130+. LemonSqueezy operates in most countries but has higher fees.

If you're in the US, UK, EU, Canada, Australia, or Japan: Stripe works. Every boilerplate supports it.

If you're in Pakistan, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria, or other non-Stripe countries: You need Polar.sh or LemonSqueezy. CheapStack and MakerKit support Polar.sh. Supastarter supports both.

2. Budget

|--------|---------|

Note that free options lack payments, admin panels, and dedicated support.

3. Feature requirements

• Solo developer, MVPs: Create T3 App, CheapStack SaaS Starter ($49)
• B2B SaaS with teams: MakerKit ($349), Supastarter (€349)
• Content-heavy (blog, docs): MakerKit, Supastarter
• AI chatbot products: CheapStack AI Chatbot Starter ($39)
• Maximum community and tutorials: ShipFast ($199)

4. Long-term considerations

• Will you need multi-tenancy? MakerKit and Supastarter have it. CheapStack's SaaS Boilerplate ($59) has it.
• Will you need Stripe AND Polar.sh? CheapStack SaaS Boilerplate ($59) and MakerKit support both.
• Will you use AI coding agents? MakerKit has MCP server support. CheapStack has AGENTS.md and .cursorrules.
• Do you need i18n? ixartz and Supastarter support it. Most others don't.

Decision matrix

|-----------|----------|

About the author: Muhammad Akbar builds affordable developer tools at CheapStack and writes about bootstrapping products on realistic budgets.